I would assume that actual TT would be more profitable, sin ethe cost to get into the hobby is basically a luxury, but people who pay it pay a lot. I had Kislevites, Bretonnians and Dogs of War as well. And having more than one army was not unusual, at least not early on.

On top of that you have paints, extra parts, basing material, the rules and the army books.

My main army was the Empire and the models alone cost me roughly 15 copies of Warhammer 3 when you adjust for the inflation. I think that a lot of people whose only experience is with computer games don't realise just how much money was involved in WHFB as a hobby. WHFB was introduced in 1983 and only ended in 2015, during that time it was so successfull that it not only funded the expansion of GW and Citadel into truly professional companies but it also provided enough money for GW to invest in numerous other games including the development of 40K. Pretty much the perfect deal.Īs for comparing the tabletop game and the computer trilogy that is not easily done since not only do GW and CA keep the actual revenue numbers secret but you would have to do a fair bit of math to adjust the Warhammer revenue to account for the inflation since it is a game that started to be sold in the 1980'sīut if we look at the leaked numbers for Total War Warhammer revenue for 2016-2019 then TWWH does not even come close to matching Warhammer Fantasy Battle. This game is very profitable for GW since licence revenue is all profit and no costs.

2K A Total War Saga: Thrones of Britannia.

847 A Total War Saga: Fall of the Samurai.

Total war warhammer free dlc hack